Just figured it out.

Just figured it out.

http://www.njspotlight.com/stories/14/11/25/analysis-partisan-and-labor-politics-drive-battle-over-health-benefits-reform/

I always wondered what argument a lawyer politician like Walker or Christie make when deciding to eliminate a category of mandatory bargaining like benefits from municipal workers.  I mean, how is it supported legally to enter into a bargaining agreement for health care with workers, and employee, agency or any legal entity, then just say you don't have the money.  Do you just tell them we don't have to? 

I just saying, if you take him verbatim, he said "we don't have the money".  He is not saying we don't have to bargain.  Just that the bargain is not enforceable because it cost too much now.  If the law is imperfect enough under capitalism to permit breach of the contractual right to bargain, if government or any employer can hire people, entice them with benefits, enter into an agreement, pass laws to tax and control every aspect of worker/employee right to redress, then walk away from obligations and blame the worker/employee, isn't socialism right?

Now I know.  "I didn't sign that".  It is just a loop hole.  Lower than a car dealer salesman.  Lawyer.

The only satisfaction one can get is knowing that whoever deal with the Lawyer is likely to get the same treatment.

Hey Mom, I can handle your will.

And this is how we do it here in NJ.